Do adnominal property words receive the same treatment as verbs when verbs are used attributively, i.e. inside an NP? The adnominal property word need not take exactly all verbal marking. If there is at least some marking that verbal and adnominal property words share, this counts as 1. The result need not be finite: participles count as attributively used verbs. This means that if the language in question forms modifying verbs by participles (the running man) and this is the same for adnominal property word roots (the redding man), this counts as 1. Property words semantically correspond to adjectives in those languages that have a separate adjective word class. We want to include elements that mark 'adjectival' function but that might not be described as 'adjectives.'
Choctaw (ISO 639-3: cho, Glottolog: choc1276)
Coded 1. The grammar states that Choctaw likely does not have a lexical class of adjectives and that their meanings are conveyed via stative verbs. The author states, however, that is useful to use the term 'adjective' because they show "peculiarities not shared by other verbs." Choctaw verbs require a tense marker. Adnominal adjectives must also take a tense marker as seen in the examples below (Broadwell 2006: 50–51, 172–173, 221–225).
(1) Hattak chaaha-h pga-li-tok. man tall-TNS see:INCMPL-1SG.CL1-PST ‘I saw the tall man.’ (Broadwell 2006: 173) (2) Hattak-at chaaha-h. man-NOM tall-TNS ‘The man is tall.’ (Broadwell 2006: 51)
Akha (ISO 639-3: ahk, Glottolog: akha1245)
Coded 0. Adjectives are generally stative verbs, however, when used attributively they take the prefix jɔ- which denotes a temporary quality. This prefix does not appear on verbs (Hansson 2017: 893–894).
ŋɑ̀-sjhà jɔ-né CL.fish-fish ADJ-red ‘red fish’ (Hansson 2017: 893)
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, Volume 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Broadwell, George Aaron. 2006. A Choctaw reference grammar. (Studies in the Anthropology of North American Indians.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hansson, Inga-Lill. 2017. Akha. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 885–901. London: Routledge.
To display the datapoints for a particular language family on the map and on the classification tree, select the family then click "submit".
You may combine this variable with a different variable by selecting on in the list below and clicking "Submit".
0 | absent | 1454 | |
1 | present | 404 | |
? | Not known | 523 |
Name | Glottocode | Family | Macroarea | Contributor | Value | Source | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|