This feature refers to Standard Negation, i.e. the constructions that mark negation of (at least) dynamic (not-stative) verbal predicates in declarative mood. The marker has to form a phonological unit with the verbal root, be it by affixation, cliticization, suppletion, reduplication, tone, etc. For markers bound to auxiliaries, see GB298. If there is negative marking on the verb and elsewhere (for example by a particle) in the same construction, this is included in this feature. If there is a clitic that attaches to anything in its vicinity, this doesn't count.
Turkish (ISO 639-3: tur, Glottolog: nucl1301)
Standard negation in Turkish is marked using the suffix -mA on the verb (Kornfilt 1997: 123). Turkish is coded as 1 for this feature.
Hasan kitab-ı oku-ma-dı Hasan book-ACC read-NEG-PST ‘Hasan didn't read the book.’ (Kornfilt 1997: 123)
Swedish (ISO 639-3: swe, Glottolog: swed1254)
Swedish accomplishes negation with a particle (icke or inte). It is possible for this particle to be phonologically bound to the verb, but it does not qualify for a 1 for this feature because it cliticizes to anything that precedes it - not just verbs. Below are examples from the Swedish dialect Jarssemål (spoken in Järvsö in Hälsingland). All examples are taken from Håkan Franck (1999) via Skigård (2010), with glosses and translation added by patron (also Skirgård). Swedish is coded as 0.
(1) free-standing Fräsen begrep int dä där, han e. Hisser understand NEG that there, 3SG.MASK NEG 'The kitty didn't understand that, did he?"
(2) cliticised to verb Jasså, du Fräsen! Du tyttje=n't ôm främmande du, e. well.then 2SG Hisser 2SG like=NEG about strangers 2SG NEG 'Well then Kitty, you don't care for strangers do you?"
(3) cliticised to pragmatic particle Dä ä ju=n't sa långt hem tä ôss, e. It is PRAG.PART=NEG so far home to us, NEG 'It's not that far home to us, is it?'
Croft, William. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 1–27.
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17. 79–106.
Dahl, Östen. 2010. Typology of negation. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 9–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Negative Morphemes. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Miestamo, Matti. 2013. Symmetric and asymmetric standard negation. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skirgård, Hedvig 2010. Finns det dubbelnegation i svenska dialekter? Inte.. e i två Hälsingemål (ENG: double negation in Swedish dialects). Ba thesis at Stockholm Univeristy
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. (Descriptive Grammars Series, Descriptive Grammars.) London: Routledge.
To display the datapoints for a particular language family on the map and on the classification tree, select the family then click "submit".
You may combine this variable with a different variable by selecting on in the list below and clicking "Submit".
0 | absent | 1225 | |
1 | present | 1076 | |
? | Not known | 115 |
Name | Glottocode | Family | Macroarea | Contributor | Value | Source | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|